After a serious injury, the number an insurance company puts in front of you can feel arbitrary, dismissive and demoralizing. Rarely is there any given explanation as to how they arrived at that figure, or what your actual claim may be worth.
While a lowball claim may be unfair, the methods used to evaluate your claim—and reevaluating it for its full, fair value—is a well-understood process. Adjusters value injury claims through a repeatable process: documented losses, internal formulas, claim-evaluation software, and a running estimate of one thing above all — what a jury in Multnomah, Clackamas, Marion, or Clark County would do with the case if it ever got that far.
Understanding that process is the difference between accepting an offer and negotiating one. Adjusters are not villains — they are employees measured on how quickly and cheaply they close files. The work of a personal injury case is making your file expensive to keep open.
Eder Sturm Eder represents injured people throughout Oregon and Southwest Washington. Call today for a free consultation about what your claim is actually worth.
Speak with a Personal Injury Attorney
The 3 Main Elements of Your Insurance Claim
Every injury claim gets evaluated on three axes at once. The first is liability: how likely is it that the insurer's driver, property owner, or client is legally responsible? A secondary question is: how much of the blame can be shifted to you? A clear-liability rear-end crash and a disputed intersection collision with identical injuries are valued very differently.
The second element taken into consideration is damages, or the real-value cost of your injuries. What can be documented, and what has to be argued? Adjusters separate the losses they can add up from the losses they have to judge. In a car accident or wrongful death claim, that gap can be hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Finally, the insurance adjuster will consider what we might broadly call risk: particularly, the risk of you taking the case to trial, where you may receive a much larger verdict. What happens if the claim does not settle? This is the axis most injured people never consider, and the one that moves numbers the most.
Factors that Can Increase Your Settlement Offer
- Objective medical evidence. Imaging, fractures, surgical findings, and impairment ratings carry far more weight than subjective complaints alone. This is why traumatic brain injuries are so often undervalued.
- Consistent, documented medical treatment. A month without care becomes an argument that you recovered — or were never really hurt.
- Permanency. An injury that resolves is valued as an episode. One that follows you for life is valued as a loss.
- Pre-existing conditions. Adjusters comb prior records for anything to blame instead of the crash. Aggravation of a pre-existing condition is compensable in both states — but expect the fight.
- Personal credibility. Recorded statements, social media posts, and any inconsistency between what you told providers and what you told the insurer become leverage.
- Available coverage. A well-documented catastrophic claim still runs into policy limits.
- Your lawyer’s trial record. Insurers track how law firms handle cases; a firm that files and tries cases is a different risk calculation than one that always settles.
How do I protect the value of my claim?
Follow through on medical care. Report every symptom, including the ones you assume will fade. Keep records — bills, treatment notes, pay stubs, mileage, and out-of-pocket receipts.
Be careful communicating with the other side. Do not give a recorded statement to the other side's insurer, and do not sign a blanket medical authorization that opens your entire history to an adjuster hunting for pre-existing conditions.
Do not rush to settle. Wait to settle until the full extent of your injuries is known. While new information about the seriousness of your injuries may increase the value of your claim, a one-time settlement cannot be supplemented with additional funds.
Speak to an attorney. Get advice early, before the record has holes in it. Contact Eder Sturm Eder for a free case evaluation.
The Two Types of Damages
Economic Damages
Also called special damages, economic damages are the losses with a paper trail. This may include:
- Past medical expenses like emergency care, imaging, surgery, physical therapy, chiropractic care, injections, and prescriptions.
- Future medical expenses, including anticipated surgeries, ongoing therapy, or long-term care, usually established by treating physicians or medical experts.
- Lost wages and lost earning capacity: time missed, reduced hours, and the long-term effect of an injury on what you can earn.
- Out-of-pocket costs, like mileage to appointments, medical equipment, home modifications, and paid help with tasks you can no longer do.
- Property damage. Vehicle repair or replacement, plus damaged personal property.
Adjusters scrutinize this category harder than most people expect. They compare billed charges against paid charges, flag treatment they consider excessive, and argue that portions of your care were unrelated or duplicative.
Noneconomic Damages
Noneconomic damages cover harm that never generates an invoice. This may include intangibles like physical pain, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, post-traumatic stress, disfigurement, and loss of consortium for a spouse. Because there is no receipt for any of these real costs, the skill of your attorney becomes critically important at the negotiation table.
A Note on Punitive Damages
While rare, some cases may also involve punitive damages, or additional costs assigned by a judge or jury to punish the defendant or send a message in a civil trial. Punitive damages only come into play in cases involving egregious acts of negligence or misconduct.
The Formulas Behind Your Adjuster’s Offer
How is your adjuster arriving at that number? Is there any validity to it? The answer varies based on the method they have been trained to use to determine your case value; many times they will underestimate the costs of your long term care or pain and suffering, or fail to consider certain items entirely.
These are the most common types of methods used to evaluate claims:
The multiplier method. This is the most common approach: an adjuster totals your economic damages (often just medical bills) and multiplies by a factor reflecting severity. Soft-tissue injuries with a full recovery may draw a multiplier near 1 to 2. Injuries requiring surgery, or leaving permanent limitations, draw considerably more. Catastrophic injuries fall outside formula territory entirely. The multiplier is not law and it is not fixed; it is an opening position, and one that a skilled attorney will successfully challenge.
The per-diem method. This is a less common approach: one used for injuries with a defined recovery period. The adjuster assigns a daily value to your suffering and multiplies it by the number of days you were affected. Many times their assessment of your daily suffering vastly underestimates the economic and noneconomic costs of your injuries.
Claim-evaluation software. Most major insurers run injury claims through a proprietary software that converts medical records into codes, producing a “settlement range” from which they can choose. These systems only reward objective findings: a documented fracture, a positive MRI, a surgical recommendation, and so on. They discount pain that appears only in a patient's own description of it, and they penalize gaps in treatment.
Regardless of how your adjuster arrived at your settlement amount, you have a right to understand their methodology, and challenge their conclusion if you feel it undervalues the true costs of your injuries. We strongly recommend working with an attorney to recover the full, fair value of your claim.
Speak with a Personal Injury Attorney
How Oregon and Washington Laws May Affect Your Claim Value
Comparative fault works differently in each state.
Oregon follows modified comparative fault under ORS 31.600: you recover as long as you were not more than 50 percent at fault, with your award reduced by your share. Washington applies pure comparative fault under RCW 4.22.005, meaning you can recover even if you were mostly at fault, reduced proportionally. Adjusters assign you a fault percentage early and quietly discount every offer by it.
Your own coverage pays first.
Personal Injury Protection does not raise the value of your claim, but it keeps unpaid medical bills from forcing you into a bad settlement. Oregon requires PIP on every auto policy which provides at least $15,000 in medical benefits regardless of fault. Washington makes PIP optional but requires insurers to offer at least $10,000, which you can only decline in writing under RCW 48.22.085.
Insurers are legally required to evaluate claims fairly.
Oregon's ORS 746.230 prohibits misrepresenting policy provisions, failing to attempt a good-faith settlement once liability is reasonably clear, and compelling claimants to initiate litigation by offering substantially less than amounts ultimately recovered. Washington's WAC 284-30-330 sets out parallel standards, and the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (RCW 48.30.015) allows first-party claimants who are unreasonably denied to recover up to three times their actual damages plus attorney fees.
Deadlines matter.
Most Oregon personal injury claims must be filed within two years; Washington allows three. If an Oregon public body is involved, written notice is due within 180 days under ORS 30.275. An adjuster who knows your deadline is approaching has no reason to improve an offer. Speak with an attorney as soon as you can to make sure you’re not leaving money on the table.
Speak with a Personal Injury Attorney
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a formula that tells me what my case is worth?
No. Multiplier and per diem calculations are starting points insurers use internally, not measures of value. Two people with identical medical bills can have very different claims depending on permanency, liability, venue, and available coverage.
Why is the first offer so low?
Low settlements limit the insurance company’s financial exposure. These offers arrive before treatment is complete, which lets the insurer value the claim on incomplete records. They also test whether you will accept quickly. Once you sign a release, you cannot return for more if your condition worsens.
Does hiring a lawyer actually change the valuation?
It changes the risk side of the equation. Represented claims are evaluated against the possibility of litigation, discovery, and trial — and against the insurer's own record of how a particular firm handles cases that do not settle.
Will my pre-existing condition destroy my claim?
No. Both Oregon and Washington allow recovery for the aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Adjusters will still use prior records to argue your symptoms predate the incident, which is why clear medical documentation of your condition before and after matters.
What if the adjuster is handling my claim in bad faith?
Both states regulate claim settlement conduct. Oregon's ORS 746.230 and Washington's WAC 284-30-330 define unfair practices; Washington's Insurance Fair Conduct Act provides a private remedy with enhanced damages for first-party claimants. If you believe the insurance company is unfairly delaying or denying your claim, document every communication and talk to a lawyer immediately.
What does it cost to have my case evaluated?
Eder Sturm Eder handles Oregon and Washington injury cases on a contingency fee basis. Consultations are free, and you pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you. If an insurance company has put a number on your injury, get a second opinion before you accept it. You have nothing to lose—and, potentially, a significant amount to gain—by speaking with us.
Call Eder Sturm Eder at (503) 227-4601 or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. We represent injured people across Oregon and Southwest Washington, including Portland, Beaverton, Hillsboro, Gresham, Salem, Eugene, Bend, Vancouver, Camas, and the surrounding communities.

Lawyer
Joel is a recipient of Super Lawyers Rising Stars awarded to no more than 2.5% of attorneys since 2022. Joel has been nominated to the National Trial Lawyers top 40 attorneys under 40 since 2019 and in 2019 he was awarded University of Oregon School of Law Outstanding Young Alumni Award. Joel served as past Chair of the Oregon New Lawyers Division. He is a featured continuing legal education speaker on a variety of litigation topics including wrongful death cases, depositions and trial strategies. His presentations have been featured locally, through the litigation section of the Oregon State Bar and nationally. Joel was born and raised in Portland and became an attorney to advocate for a community he cares deeply about. This passion drives him to get the best results in every case. He worked for a major insurance company and was quickly entrusted to handle complex lawsuits worth millions of dollars ranging from motor vehicle accidents, insurance coverage and benefits disputes, property loss, premises liability, slip and falls, fire losses, construction defect and product liability claims. His passion for helping people inspired him to use his experience, in the courtroom and representing a large insurance company, to aid injured people in maximizing their recoveries in a way other lawyers cannot. Joel is an active member in the legal community serving in various positions within the Oregon New Lawyers Division including Chair of the Division. He is a featured continuing legal education speaker on a variety of litigation topics including wrongful death cases, depositions and trial strategies. His presentations have been featured locally, through the litigation section of the Oregon State Bar and nationally. He was recognized for his advocacy by receiving the 2019 University of Oregon School of Law Outstanding Young Alumni Award and was nominated to the National Trial Lawyers top 40 attorneys under 40 in 2019. Joel received his undergraduate degree from Gonzaga University and attended University of Oregon for law school. He is a huge fan of Gonzaga basketball, an ex-lacrosse player and he has a weakness for 1960’s soul ballads. Prior to starting his legal career, Joel and his wife Nanda were volunteers at a school in Peru where they started a sports program for elementary age students. Joel loves to cook for his wife and three kids, Neela, Bodhi and Zia.
Schedule a free consultation.
It's quick, confidential, and there's no obligation.
Need to speak with someone right away? Call (503) 227-4601